Tag Archives: Boring Things About Me

Top 5 – children’s books that had the biggest impact on little-me

New monthly feature!

So I’ve not posted for a while and I probably won’t have my next review up for a while either (due to uniwork I’ve not even picked it up in a week despite absolutely loving it so far). So partly because I don’t want to abandon this blog for too long and partly because I think it looks like a fun idea, I’m going to take a leaf out other bloggers books and start a monthly ‘Top 5’. As always do feel free to comment, disagree with me, share your own choices, and recommend me subjects to use for future posts.

This week, top 5 children’s books that had the biggest impact on little-me (In the order that I read them) Continue reading



Filed under Not Reviews, Top 5

So I got a Goodreads account…

Pretty much what it says up there ^ For anyone who’s interested this is me and I will probably be adding a Goodreads widget to the blog soon

Now this is new territory for me – I’d never even heard of Goodreads until a couple of months ago when some YA authors caused such a drama attacking negative reviews and bullying the reviewers that it got reported in the Guardian.  This along with more shitty behaviour (scroll down to Scandalous Scandals) put me off a bit. But actually I do like the idea of a reading-centric social networking site – I don’t use Facebook very often because I don’t give much of a shit about what people I barely knew in school get up to when they’re drunk, but if everyone’s status updates were about books I’d be in there debating and sharing opinions like no man’s business. I also like the idea of one website where you can catalogue what books you’re reading, have read, want to read etc.etc. so neatly. So after comforting myself with the idea that the sort of author (and in some cases reviewer) wank above was limited to the YA genre which isn’t really my thing anyway, I decided to sign up.

I’m just exploring the site now but already I can see that I’m going to be treating my ratings and reviews very differently over there than I do here. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Announcements, Not Reviews

Not a Review

So I hoped to have Gulliver’s Travels finished and my review up by now but life, as it is wont to do, decided to get in the way of my ability to curl up with a book. Or, to be more accurate, I’m a rubbish person who leaves all my uni work to the last minute so instead of curling up with a nice book and a mug of hot chocolate I end up frantically pulling a late-nighter, flicking through pages of academic books and history journals, double checking facts, and wishing I liked the taste of caffeine (the guy who does the ‘health MOTs’ at the gym will hate it but I am totally putting down ‘develop a liking for coffee’ onto my list of new years resolutions).

Anyways I’m not really posting to update you all on the very dull happenings in my life, and after I said my updates would be sporadic I’m not posting to apologise for that either. Mainly I just want to share a very awesome book related youtube video I found the other day.

Disclaimer: I had nothing to do with the making of this, I just think it’s incredible

Oh and if anyone cares I think I did ok with the uni presentation and since public speaking is a totally nerve-wracking experience for me I went and rewarded myself with a trip to the bookshop. First new years resolution of buying no more books until I finish those I already have well and truly broken. Let’s hope I manage to stick to my ‘start liking coffee’ one.

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Reviews, Random Links


Not that I expect anybody but me to read this but hello and welcome to anyone who is!

I’m Louise, and in this blog I’ll be attempting to review each and every book I read this year. I don’t claim that I’ll be any good at it – I’ve not studied English Literature since school. I do, however, love reading and enjoy discussing books and find that there is almost nothing more frustrating than being asked a question about something I’ve read a long time ago and not being able to say anything about it.

After several terrible conversations over the holidays with my sister where I totally failed to articulate why I liked/disliked certain books, and several much more rewarding conversations on books I’d read more recently or had left more marked impressions on me,  I decided to start this blog. I’m hoping that putting time aside specifically for thinking over a book and getting those thoughts down on paper  (or rather screen) will help me articulate them better to myself and prevent me from shouting ‘I just didn’t like it, ok?’ when someone keeps pressing me as to why I hate some wildly popular novel.

Although my main intent in writing this blog is to properly form my own opinions before moving onto my next book instead of just churning my way through them, if anyone is reading this and wants to disagree or discuss anything I end up writing I’d really welcome that. As I said, I do love a bit of literary discussion and am always interested to hear dissenting opinions and listen to interpretations that had never occurred to me before. You may even change my mind about something.

I aim to update this blog after I finish each book but I am not setting myself a strict timetable for reading some books may take no time to read, others may take ages, sometimes I may find myself far too busy with uni work to read at all, so updates will likely be at random intervals. Occasionally I might also throw in a review of a TV/Film adaptation or audiobook  if the mood takes me.

Now, despite having read a lot of interesting books in 2011 that I would love to discuss I am not going to review these books – too much time has passed since I actually read them for me to feel comfortable doing so, I will doubtless get some details wrong. The time I do have to read I want to be spending on new books. I will however put up a few of my key questions from 2011’s reading for anyone because I think there are several worthy of discussion if people are interested.

Jane Austen: I read all of her completed novels over the summer so sadly unless I do a reread at some point will not be reviewing any of these

  • Which is your favourite Jane Austen book and why? (I’m undecided. Northanger Abbey was really different and I definitely enjoyed all of them but I think I’m going to have to be really boring and go with Pride and Prejudice)
  • Is Fanny Price a likable character? (I can’t be the only one who finds her insufferable, can I?)
  • Does the Emma Thompson film do a better job of reconciling you to Marianne’s ‘happy ending’ in Sense and Sensibility than the book did? (I really think it does, how much that’s to do with my old-man-crush on Alan Rickman I’m not sure, but I found the way her ending was dealt with in the book very uncomfortable.)

The Three Musketeers, Alexandre Dumas:

  • Was Milady de Winter’s fate truly deserved? (Another ending that left me very very uncomfortable.)
  • Can a modern reader find Athos admirable, or even likable? (I certainly couldn’t and found him more of a monster than the villains of the book)
  • How do you ensure that you find the best possible translation? What makes a decent translation? Is finding an ‘uncensored’ translation that doesn’t hack away bits more important than finding the most ‘readable’?

The Millennium Trilogy, Stieg Larseon: I found this very readable but had some very serious issues with certain aspects

  • Can we really lap up Lisbeth Sandler and Mikael Blomkvist’s extremely unethical journalism without question while at the same time being outraged by News of the World?
  • Why could no character validly disagree with Blomkvist without later turning out to be violent, a rapist, or both? 
  • Did anyone care at all for Blomkvist’s love life? Is it really important that he shags every attractive female character? Seems like wish fulfilment.
  • Do we need an English Language remake of a film so soon after an internationally successful version in the original language? Is it aimed at the people who saw the first or those that didn’t go because it was foreign?
  • Am I taking a page-turner too seriously?

Other Books:

  • In historical fiction does a purely fictional character influencing a real person or event break or enhance your suspension of disbelief? (I think this is definitely a personal preference thing. I certainly found my sense of immersion completely shattered in the otherwise fairly enjoyable Star of the Sea by Joseph O’Connor when a character gave Dickens the idea and plot of Oliver Twist in an aside that really had nothing to do with anything in the main story and found myself having trouble getting back into the book after that.)
  • Short stories or novels? Which do you enjoy more and why? What short story authors would you recommend?
  • Is it ok to send a book straight to a charity shop without finishing or should you give it a second chance? (I read two books this year I found really hard to get into, The Sunday Morning Philosophy Club was so awful it went straight to the British Heart Foundation but the second, Visitation by Jenny Erpenbeck, I found myself absolutely loving once I gave myself a month off and started afresh.)
  • Is it better to read a book before the TV/film adaptation or to read the book afterwards? (I’ve always tried to follow the ‘book first’ pattern but after really enjoying HBO’s Game of Thrones I find myself owning all the paperback books in the series but wanting to wait until after the relevant TV season has aired for maximum enjoyment of both TV and novel)

Ok…so that was a lot more issues than I planned on raising, especially when I don’t have a readership yet, but there you go. Hopefully it’ll give you an idea of the sort of things I’ll be picking up on and the sorts of books I’ll be reading – though I like to think I’m pretty varied in my tastes.

First few reviews should be up in the next few days – Aesop’s Fables, Hans Christian Anderson’s Fairy Tales, and volume 16 of Fables (comic book). Expect Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift sometime after that, only just started it.

1 Comment

Filed under Announcements, Not Reviews